36 Starting Risks / 6 Categories

Risk needs an owner.
Not a hiding place.

Set likelihood, impact, owner and status for preloaded Nepal hospitality-development risks. Use the result to define review and control - not to certify safety.

Starting prompts only. Scores are user-selected and do not prove control effectiveness. Qualified advisers must identify project-specific risks and evidence.

Current exposure0weighted open score
0 Critical0 High0 Owner assigned0 Closed

Showing all 36 starting risks.

Live 5 x 5 View

Likelihood-impact matrix

Counts update as you score the register. Closed items are excluded from exposure but remain visible in their selected cell.

Risk Discipline

Development risk FAQs

What is the development risk register?

It is a planning framework covering 36 preloaded hospitality-development risk prompts. It is not legal, engineering, safety, financial or project-management certification.

Does it replace a professional project manager or adviser?

No. It helps structure ownership and questions. Qualified professionals remain responsible for defining, verifying and signing their work.

Are the preloaded risks complete?

No. They are starting prompts. The actual site, contracts, design, procurement, community, environment and operations require project-specific risks.

Does a low risk score prove that the project is safe?

No. Scores reflect user selections and can never replace investigation, evidence, controls, monitoring or professional judgement.

Can more than one person contribute to a deliverable?

Yes, but one accountable role should normally own the final decision and evidence while contributors support it.

Where are assignments and risk selections stored?

They stay in local storage in this browser unless the user deliberately copies a summary or submits an enquiry.

Is personal information included in the tool?

The tools do not ask for personal contact data. Contact details are only entered in the separate enquiry form when the user chooses.

How often should the register be reviewed?

Review it at every decision gate and whenever land, design, cost, contract, programme, approval, operator or opening assumptions change.

Who can change a risk status?

The project should define authority, evidence requirements and review frequency. A browser selection alone is not formal project approval.

What does accountable mean in the responsibility matrix?

It identifies the single role expected to own the decision and final evidence, not necessarily the person performing every task.

Can these tools be used for an existing hotel?

Yes, after adapting the risks and deliverables to live operations, asset condition, current contracts and actual performance evidence.

What happens after requesting a governance review?

The enquiry provides context for a human scope discussion. It creates no appointment, approval, quotation, contract or payment.