What information is needed to begin a feasibility review?
Useful inputs include site location, ownership or authority documents, survey data, access, photographs, project ambition and approximate investment range.
Does feasibility include detailed architectural drawings?
Usually no. It may include planning concepts or test fits, while detailed architecture follows an approved development brief.
Can the study confirm the final construction cost?
No. Early estimates are indicative and become more reliable only as design, specifications, quantities and procurement conditions develop.
How are risks presented?
Material risks should be recorded with their evidence, likely effect, information gap and recommended response.
What happens after a positive feasibility result?
The next step is normally a defined design and delivery brief with clear responsibilities, milestones and budget controls.
How are demand assumptions tested?
Use current destination evidence, comparable supply, access, seasonality, guest segments and realistic pricing scenarios rather than a single optimistic forecast.
Why is site access assessed so early?
Construction logistics, guest arrival, emergency access, slope and seasonal reliability can reshape the viable concept and budget.
Can feasibility recommend a smaller first phase?
Yes. A staged concept may better align evidence, capital and operating capacity, although its interfaces and future expansion must be planned.
What can cause a site to be paused?
Unclear land authority, material hazards, access constraints, weak demand logic, utility limitations or unresolved approvals can justify a hold.
What should a feasibility conclusion contain?
It should identify evidence, assumptions, scenarios, constraints, material risks, recommended next steps and the conditions attached to any proceed decision.